Share Poll

Poll link

500 px
350 px
250 px
Preview

widget preview:

Width - px Height - px

Close preview
! You are using a non-supported browser Your browser version is not optimised for Toluna, we recommend that you install the latest version Upgrade
Our Privacy Notice governs your membership of our Influencer Panel, which you can access here. Our website uses cookies. Like in the offline world, cookies make things better. To learn more about the cookies we use, check out our Cookies policy.

TolunaTeamAUNZ

  55 months ago

What's Your Opinion (AU): Should employers discriminate against potential job candidates because they have tattoos?
Closed

Thanks to everyone who participated in our previous "What's Your Opinion" topic. You have all provided some interesting opinions. Here are the members who have won 3,000 bonus points! (Points will be credited within 7 days)

bellz85
kikizen
Andeelina

Now, let's move on the next topic!

How does it work? Write a quality opinion/comment on this topic and we will choose 3 random winners to win 3,000 points each! (No need to post your own Topic)

Our question this week is: Should employers discriminate against potential job candidates because they have tattoos? This is in light of a public appeal on Facebook by a 19-year-old New Zealand man, who has been finding it difficult to find employment due to a large tattoo on his face.

Ground Rules: Open to AU and NZ members only. Each week, the TolunaTeamAUNZ will create a topic on the AU and NZ sites regarding a specific theme, and ask members to provide their opinion. Three winners will be selected from each Australia and New Zealand to win 3,000 points. Winners will be chosen at random from all eligible posts. Eligible posts must be in compliance with the Toluna Member Code of Conduct. Winners will be announced within 2 weeks from launch of Topic, and bonus points credited to member accounts via direct credit.
Reply

monicag8

  54 months ago
Tattoos are supposed to be cool or rebel - but they are often considered ugly and thus banned. They are also linked to thugs and gangs, which is unprofessional and uninviting. Employers should not allow employees to wear tattoos because it is a rebel act to have one, and thus unprofessional.
0 comments

beesl

  54 months ago
Employers have to employ staff that meet criteria based on the industry and the workplace. Customers have to feel comfortable with the person who is looking after them and rightly or wrongly that initial decision to trust is based on appearance.
0 comments

bluemeanie

  54 months ago
It depends on the job, the role in that job, the location of the tattoo and the nature of the image.
0 comments

piercethebones

  54 months ago
I believe tattoo's are a subjective piece of art, that is all. Who is to say that a tattoo, whether it has any meaning or not, defines a person? We don't define people by their freckles, their scars, their marks on their skin. If someone wants to have a tattoo, it is not up for any person to decide.
This reminds me of my family, who are pretty anti-tattoo. I told my mother I wanted a small tattoo that I have been thinking about for 8 years, and she said I couldn't get it. But, here's the thing: It isn't the family's skin, it's mine.
So, when companies say they dislike tattoos, it isn't the companies skin they are tattooing!
0 comments

williamm50

  54 months ago
depending the industry
0 comments

CindyN

  54 months ago
Tattoos are a very personal thing and people shouldn't be judged for displaying their artwork if it is not off-putting to customers and clients. To have your face tattooed is a public declaration, could even be seen as attention seeking, but if it is tribal markings and a celebration of your culture, it should be respected as such. Totally depends on the person, their attitude, their culture (as in Maori tattoos, for example, and the reaction of the clientele they face in their workplace.
0 comments

Ez_95

  54 months ago
Definitely not ! People can still look professional and have tattoos. If they were unkempt i would understand but other wise it's not there business
With exception of full blown face tattoos
0 comments

kerferd4

  54 months ago
No, if they are small and does not show, they can pull down their sleeves, or wear long pants, but if it is on their face it makes it harder to hide. They should find a job where it does not matter.
0 comments

beress9484

  54 months ago
No
0 comments

hillsy3871

  54 months ago
They should not be discriminated against. My nephew wants to go into army & he has tattoos. They need to be removed but only visible ones. Unfortunately his neck,wrists & fingers are visible. He has finger tatts removed & this week more removed. So does that show dedication & determination & persistance from him to achieve hos goal to better his life & possibly his country too? On ya Jas love ya for the person you are! Does that let my oppinion come through? I shold hope so!
0 comments
Copied to clipboard

You’re almost there

In order to create content on the community

Verify your Email / resend
No thanks, I’m just looking

OK
Cancel
We have disabled our Facebook login process. Please enter your Facebook email to receive a password creation link.
Please enter a valid Email
Cancel
We're working on it...
When you upload a picture, our site looks better.
Upload